Globalist Media Defining Reality: 9/11, 2010

Tribute in Light, 3rd beam illuminating 9/11 Truth
By Tony Cartalucci

3 lights shine upward on 9/11, 2010, the
third light lit by AE911Truth for WTC 7.

"O'Brien held up his left hand, its back towards Winston, with the thumb hidden and the four fingers extended.

"How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?"


"Four."

"And if the Party says that it is not four but five - then how many?"" -George Orwell's 1984

And when there are three beams of light shining skyward on September 11, 2010 in memory of WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7, but the globalists say there are only two - then how many?



The mainstream media says two.



It is such brazen manipulation, so easily achieved, when surely millions saw 3 lights, but not a word of it can be found in print, on television, on the radio, and scarcely across the web, to a point where I am not even sure how many lights actually shone over New York City on 9/11, 2010.

The alternative media has done an excellent job deciphering mainstream news and exposing the truth behind each story. Reporting events that the mainstream media refuses to cover entirely, still needs some work.

Cass Sunstein's Plan to Prove the Government Isn't Lying: Lie

By Tony Cartalucci

From Cass Sunstein's "Conspiracy Theories" examining why the world thinks 9/11 is an inside job, generally distrusts the United States government, and how he thinks deception, infiltration, and flat out lying is a possible solution:

"In one variant, government agents would openly proclaim, or at least make no
effort to conceal, their institutional affiliations. A recent newspaper story recounts that
Arabic-speaking Muslim officials from the State Department have participated in
dialogues at radical Islamist chat rooms and websites in order to ventilate arguments not
usually heard among the groups that cluster around those sites, with some success.

In
another variant, government officials would participate anonymously or even with false
identities. Each approach has distinct costs and benefits; the second is riskier but
potentially brings higher returns. In the former case, where government officials
participate openly as such, hard-core members of the relevant networks, communities and
conspiracy-minded organizations may entirely discount what the officials say, right from
the beginning. The risk with tactics of anonymous participation, conversely, is that if the
tactic becomes known, any true member of the relevant groups who raises doubts may be
suspected of government connections. Despite these difficulties, the two forms of
cognitive infiltration offer different risk-reward mixes and are both potentially useful
instruments."

Also within Sunstein's report is the brazen suggestion that independent "experts" be used as proxies as to obfuscate the government's role in disseminating information.

"Government can partially circumvent these problems if it enlists nongovernmental
officials in the effort to rebut the theories. It might ensure that credible independent
experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a
tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that
government cannot be seen to control the independent experts. Although government can
supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action
from behind the scenes, too close a connection will prove self-defeating if it is exposed --
as witness the humiliating disclosures showing that apparently independent opinions on scientific and regulatory questions were in fact paid for by think-tanks with ties to the Bush administration. Even apart from this tradeoff, conspiracy theorists may still fold
independent third-party rebuttals into their theory by making conspiratorial claims of
connection between the third party and the government."

The very act of enlisting nongovernmental officials, supplying them with information, and to then "prod them into action from behind the scenes," entirely negates their independent, impartial nature. And somehow, after all of this, the final result is supposed to be a public that once again trusts the government.

This isn't the first time the globalists have tried to white wash their conduct with buckets full of muck. The United States Air Force also was revealed by Wired magazine to be conducting their own "counter-blogging" program. Its aims slightly more general in nature, the program encourages Airman to actively monitor, correct or concur with comments on various blogs.

Be aware that there are infiltrators monitoring, manipulating, and possibly trying to entrap you online in forums, in comment sections, and in chat rooms. Please remember also that Cass Sunstein talks about "real world" infiltrators. Be aware that infiltrators are also manipulating, monitoring, inciting, and entrapping people at demonstrations, gatherings, and townhall meetings.



Police infiltrators posing as protesters to incite violence.

Expose this tactic and remove it from the globalists' arsenal. If everyone knows what these infiltrators look like, their activities will ultimately become "self-defeating" as even Sunstein fully acknowledges in his sophomoric grappling with the monumental corner his globalist paymasters have painted themselves into.

Globalist Stunts: Global Climate Change

Part two in a series exposing globalist stunts foisted upon humanity at the cost of our lives, our livelihood, our past and our future. For Part 1, Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia, click here.

By Tony Cartalucci


The story of "global warming" starts 65 million years ago, during the Cretaceous period. According to National Geographic "Two New Dinosaurs Discovered in Antarctica," "Antarctica has sat at much the same latitude for the last hundred million years. But during the Cretaceous it enjoyed a warmer, lusher climate, similar to that of the U.S. Pacific Northwest today. (The Cretaceous period started 144 million years ago and ended 65 million years ago.)"

During this period, what is now North America featured a massive inland sea covering much of the Midwest.

Mesozoic Inland Sea of North America - 65 million B.C.
Global warming and rising sea levels occurred naturally, long before the first humans ever existed. An honest and thorough study of natural history reveals that wild, linear fluctuations are the only 'norms' that exist in terms of climatology. Consider the ever changing geological face of the earth. Pangaea, the mega-continent that existed 250 million years ago, surely affected global climate and drove its change as it shifted and separated into today's seven continents.

Geology - shifting continents, pushing islands up from beneath the sea while swallowing others, not only drove climatology, but biology as well. Flora and fauna populations shift, expand and contract as geology shapes the ever changing face of the earth. At no two points in natural history does the earth look the same, geologically, biologically, climatologically, nor will such a phenomenon ever be possible. It is a constant linear process, not a cycle. Cycles are superficial and temporary, existing for relatively minuscule periods of time.

Has this fact, evident to school children looking at pictures of prehistoric America complete with inland seas, long extinct animals and plant life, eluded our top scientific minds? Obviously not.

Global warming is in fact a scam perpetrated by globalists to control every aspect of human industry, population, consumption and demographics, as declared in the United Nation's Agenda 21 report and conclusions drawn at the globalist Club of Rome forum. After decades of uncontested propagandizing, the globalist agenda began to slow under the scrutiny of skeptics able to propose their objections en-mass via the Internet.

Under increasing pressure, exposing inconsistencies and bold faced lies, globalists themselves have literally conceded that their "irrefutable research" on all fronts is "flawed," (read: lies).

Times Online: "UN climate chief admits Mistake on Himalayan glaciers warning"

Times Online: "UN climate change expert: there could be more errors in report"

Mail Online: "Climategate U-turn as Scientist at Centre of Row Admits: There has been no global warming since 1995."

Telegraph: "UN admits flaw in report on meat and climate change"

Obviously the irrefutable scientific consensus Al Gore proposed is as contrived as the globalist "War on Terror" threat. And just like the fraudulent "War on Terror," "global climate change" has reaped globalist corporate combines a windfall of profits.

Remember the "Carbon Clock" put up in New York City's Times Square? It wasn't genuine conservationists behind this public stunt, but the shifty banksters over at Deutsche Bank. According to Deutsche Bank's own website, "Deutsche Bank has been a leading participant in the international carbon credit market since its inception."

Money is to be made on the back of this hoax, and so the globalist controlled media is going to keep the fear mongering going as long as possible/profitable. Carbon trading is merely the first in a long series of brazen domineering financial scams working in tandem with the "War on Terror" driven police state, and big-pharma driven "pandemic" vaccine scams. The next step is literally taxing CO2 emissions.

Since the contrived monetization of "carbon" like all financial markets, depends on a certain level of stability, and the science behind carbon emissions, by the UN's own admission is far from settled, society is being shoehorned into these markets where key players refuse to change the rules once agreed upon and fraudulent money starts flowing. Does this sound like a solution or a swindle?

The fact that the climate has forever been in a perpetual state of change and the fact that it is now public knowledge that the "science" behind "global climate change" is fraudulent, doesn't matter to the globalists. They will simply insist, as White House Science Adviser John Holdren does here, that any change of weather constitutes justification for their criminal intentions.



Criminal scams like carbon trading and carbon taxes don't just represent unprecedented corruption on a global scale. They threaten human progress altogether.

Cars do pollute our air. Poison is being dumped into our water. Genetically modified organisms are corrupting natural flora and fauna worldwide. Resources could be more efficiently used, manufacturing processes improved, and new forms of energy and transportation pursued. Manufacturing and agriculture could be decentralized/localized to allow people to be more directly involved in the mechanisms of society and not only improve efficiency, but speed up the progress at which efficiency is achieved. This requires improved education, innovation, and mountains of regulations protecting destructive corporate monopolies to be removed. Strangely, none of these solutions are part of the globalists' agenda.

By exacting a tax on human activity, the globalists tighten control over populations worldwide, narrowing their ability to sustain themselves and increase their dependence on their global institutions. It would then be up to us to trust these handful of global elitists, who have written ad nauseum about their desire to reduce our numbers and subjugate us with a global planetary regime. Judging by the behavior of prime suspects like Deutsche Bank, who already have looted and robbed within their own burgeoning carbon trading scam, its obvious such trust would be misplaced - and much to the detriment of humanity.



Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia


Elites use movies and "documentaries" past and present to stoke war and atrocities.


It started with speeches by President George Bush like this one he delivered at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland in 2005. In it, he states that terrorists "would then use Iraq as a base from which to launch attacks against America and overthrow moderate governments in the Middle East and try to establish a totalitarian Islamic empire that reaches from Indonesia to Spain."

Never mind using the consequences of the invasion as justification FOR the invasion; the "clash of civilizations" was born. The target audience was the average American and European, profoundly ignorant, religious zealots in their own right, and true believers that bearded men in turbans outwitted America's trillion dollar defense network on 9/11 and has continued to confound the world's most powerful military for now nearly a decade.

Able to overlook billions in war profits for the Council on Foreign Relations' various corporate members, like DynCorp and KBR and the fact that the war in Afghanistan is growing the world's largest narco-terrorist state, complete with US troops guarding opium fields and the CIA funding drug kingpins running the country, this demographic is made to believe Islam itself is the root of all problems.

George Bush, of course, doesn't ever officially declare this. He leaves this job to the real leadership, the globalist think tanks and their satellite organizations.

Council on Foreign Relations tentacle PNAC (Project for a New American Century), was already fleshing out the "War" part of the "War on Terror" long before 9/11 took place in their "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report in 2000. In it, the only missing ingredient for their full-spectrum domination of the planet was a catalyzing event, a "new Pearl Harbor."

Of course on 9/11 they got their "new Pearl Harbor." The next step, as any war propagandist ever to live since the beginning of humanity knows, was to dehumanize the supposed enemy. The enemy was decidedly "Islam."

"All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach." -Adolf Hitler

Not much has changed since Hitler and his henchmen duped an entire nation into a suicidal war that cost millions their lives and decades of painful recovery. Watching the 2006 war propaganda film "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West" featuring British police informants, Council on Foreign Relations PNAC signatory "Islamophobia" ring leader Daniel Pipes, and Steven Emerson of "The Investigative Project on Terrorism," we are reminded by its cartoonish nature that ghoulish men still strictly adhere to Hitler's doctrine of duping the masses with rudimentary fear mongering . David Horowitz, of the "Freedom Center" toured America screening the propaganda film, while the "Clarion Fund" mass-mailed it to millions of Americans ahead of the 2008 presidential election.

A quick look at Daniel Pipes' or Steven Emerson's websites will show shameless and relentless reinforcement of the U.S. government's official narrative surrounding 9/11; that it was perpetrated by "radical Islam" and that "radical Islam" is the greatest threat the West now faces. Steven Emerson's "Investigative Project on Terrorism" recently sent one of their salesmen to Bill O'Reilly's show on CFR News Corporation's Fox News, trying to link "Truthers" with radical Islam.



Perhaps the most insulting aspect of this clip was the omitted fact that Faisal Abdul Rauf is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, like Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation, while his activities are being openly funded by the Carnegie Corporation and various Rockefeller funding arms, all chaired by CFR members. In fact, O'Reilly features video of Rauf speaking in front of the CFR.

Other permanent fixtures of the globalist's "Islamophobia" stunt are Robert Spencer of "Jihad Watch," a David Horowitz Freedom Center project, and Pamela Geller of "Atlas Shrugs." A quick look at the sensational, cartoonish headlines, trying to blame everything from stubbed toes to dry mouth on Islam, we are reminded of Adolf Hitler's "comprehension of the least intelligent" tenant of propaganda.

Robert Spencer divides his time between commentating on Fox News, speaking in front of the globalist Heritage Foundation, and writing book, after book cherry picking versus from the Qu'ran to demonize a religion of over a billion adherents. One book he wrote, co-authored with the above mentioned Pamella Geller, titled "The Post American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America," received a forward written in it by notorious war monger, PNAC signatory, and Council on Foreign Relations member, John Bolton.

John Bolton doesn't just settle for writing forwards for opportunistic propagandists like Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, he also gives them exclusive interviews.




That John Bolton and Daniel Pipes of the Council on Foreign Relations, and participants in the various pre-9/11 pro-war PNAC publications are constantly turning up in propaganda films like "Obsession," and behind war propaganda clearing houses like "Jihad Watch" and "Atlas Shrugs" engenders serious suspicion due to an equally serious conflict of interest.

Understand that these men are direct beneficiaries, perhaps the only beneficiaries of the endless war that has resulted from 9/11 and the threat of their manufactured "radical Islam." It is in their best interest to keep the fear, the hatred and the resulting "clash of civilizations" going on as long as possible/profitable.

Victims of Pipes, Spencer, Bolton, Geller, and Horowtiz's cartoonish war propaganda need to remember it is the Department of Homeland Security dismantling the Bill of Rights, not Al Qaeda. It is the bankers and globalists flooding America with immigrants, preventing Americans from defending their borders and enacting free trade collapsing America's economy. The Council on Foreign Relations wrote "Building a North American Community," not bearded men, wearing turbans and hiding in caves. And if anyone comes to the realization that 9/11 is indeed an inside job, then the game these modern day propagandists are playing becomes all the more transparent, and people listening to them - their anger ever more misdirected.

These men, like Hitler, appealing to the most ignorant in society, plan on leading the nations of the world into yet another suicidal war, from which only they will benefit from. Remember, the dividers, the globalists, they are the enemy.

In closing, here is a link to an interview, part of David Horowitz' "Freedom Center" activities featuring David Horowitz, CFR Daniel Pipes, and CFR John Bolton during a Q&A session. These globalist creatures, their demeanor, their making fun of violence they have stoked but are safely removed from as they giggle, speaks for itself.

Hun Sen, a Globalist Model Pet


Cambodian PM Hun Sen (left) and Thailand's Thaksin Shinwatra (right), two globalist peas in a pod.

by Tony Cartalucci

"Prime Minister" Hun Sen of Cambodia has occupied the nation's seat of power for 25 years. Term limits don't exist, neither does any real opposition. In 1997, when last Hun Sen lost an election, he butchered and exiled his opposition in a bloodly military coup.

Such a man is surely a candidate for the "Axis of Evil" and should be mentioned in every other breath by the media along side Iran, North Korea, and Burma. But wait ... most people have never heard the name "Hun Sen" nor do they hear any news at all coming from this Southeast Asian backwater.

Indeed, Cambodia has enjoyed the benefits of mainstream media immunity, along with other brutal dictatorships like Saudi Arabia. While a 30 year old video of Taliban hitting women with sticks is left looping on CNN and Fox News, Saudi Arabia weekly opens up "Chop-Chop Square" to decapitate enemies of the state, under the watchful eyes of the United States, fully funding, training, and implementing defense and security within the Kingdom.

Likewise, Cambodia is a brutal dictatorship. While the Khmer Rouge might not be murdering its people by the millions, at least not as quickly, old Hun Sen, former Khmer Rouge himself, has displaced and oppressed millions under his long and very undemocratic rule. According to the London Guardian, nearly half of Cambodia's landmass has been sold to foreign investors by 2008.

Today, the Cambodian military is literally being sold off to corporations now possessing wide swaths of land as mercenary forces to crush any local opposition. Surely displacing millions, and selling land out from under people is criminal, and an affront to humanity. But strangely enough, this story goes unreported, the UN remains eerily silent, and in fact, the United States, as of 2010 has begun training many of the most notorious landgrabbing military units involved in this atrocity.

Indeed, Operation Angkor Sentinel kicked off in July 2010 as US Army troops trained with the local Cambodian troops. The United States shamelessly defends the exercises claiming that “Our military relationship is about ... working toward effective defence reform, toward encouraging the kind of civil-military relationship that is essential to any healthy political system,” according to William Burns, the US undersecretary of state for political affairs.

In reality, investors come from the United States, Europe, United Kingdom and Australia, buying tracts of land in some cases the size of Singapore in single deals, and which require protection from locals who have literally been pushed off their land at gunpoint. It is much more likely the Cambodian troops are receiving US military training and aid because globalist assets need protecting and Hun Sen has proven himself a stooge of serious potential.

Like previous stooges in their glory days, such as Saddam Hussien, the Shah of Iran, or even neighboring Thailand's notirous global stooge Thaksin Shinwatra, all can be forgiven, and covered up by the mainstream media, as long as the beneficiaries of atrocities and oppression are the globalists. Hun Sen most certainly is doing well for himself, and the key to his continued success will be back-bending compliance to the globalists and their designs.

Last year, Hun Sen's willingness to work toward globalist interests transcended the failed state he presides over, with his appointment of Thailand's ousted/fugitive Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra as his "Financial Adviser."

In addition, after the 2009 April riots conducted by Thaksin's Marxist "red shirts" many of the leaders fled to Cambodia as a safe haven and base to continue stoking violence and unrest, and even arm the Marxist rebels with weapons acquired in Cambodia.

Thaksin's proxy political party have repeatedly held meetings inside Cambodia with their exiled leader, and after the recent 2010 April/May unrest, again, Thaksin's scattered leadership fled to Cambodia for safety and to reorganize.

Thaksin's "red shirts" are reminiscent of the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia, who between civil war, genocide, and a large dose of communism, reduced the Cambodian people to the easily exploited nation it is today. The fact that Robert Amsterdam, of Amsterdam & Peroff, major corporate members of the globalist nexus Chatham House, is behind Thaksin, along with the BBC, Economist and some of the largest banking and corporate interests on earth, doesn't bode well for neighboring Thailand. It is more than likely the globalists to a certain degree would like to recreate in Thailand their success in Cambodia, a globalist free-for-all amongst the ashes of a broken people. Thaksin Shinwatra is their "Hun Sen 2.0."

So while Robert Amsterdam churns out volumes of "white papers" regarding the Thai government's treatment of armed Marxist rebels, he is strangely silent about his
own client's ties to Cambodia's Hun Sen, and his continuing crimes against humanity.

Hun Sen appears to be standing on the precipice of another "Dubai." A land of zero taxes catering to foreign investors, and red-hot property speculation that will catapult the 3rd world nation to a faux-first-world showcase.

Unlike Dubai, which has a very tiny local population, Cambodia has a human obstacle standing in the way of wall-to-wall exploitation. It seems as if the US Army and the globalists are more than prepared to clear this obstacle, in the most abhorrent way possible - which is why you haven't heard of Hun Sen, or any news from Cambodia, and won't until Hun Sen backpedals or lines his pockets a little too much, and needs to be replaced.

9/11 was an Inside Job





My Personal Wake Up Call


An Editorial by Tony Cartalucci


9/11 actually started for me in July 2001. I was a young Marine stationed at Camp Hansen, Okinawa, Japan. Infantry Marines from 1/3 on deployment to Japan from Hawaii were receiving new desert uniforms, M4 carbines, and training for what looked like World War 3. Two of these Marines went through boot camp with me a year before, and told me their commanding officer had said "We can't tell you where you are going or when, but when you come home you will be hailed heroes and have at least 2 new medals to wear."

I would find out later both India and Pakistan were on notice for an impending attack on Afghanistan months before 9/11 even took place. Despite the nearly year long media campaign to sell the war with Iraq to the public, and the now years long campaign to sell a war with Iran, there was zero build-up for the planned Afghanistan invasion. Tony Blair, former PM of the United Kingdom, admitted himself that, "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11."

9/11 would turn out to be the only "selling point" needed to launch a war with Afghanistan.

I was at the base of Mount Fuji during the attacks on September 11, 2001. In the following days, a chief warrant officer in my battalion was explaining how his stock broker dumped his airline stocks on a hot tip right before the attacks. He was the only man smiling that gloomy, uncertain week. Other, older officers were talking about how Osama Bin Laden, the principle suspect, was a creation of the CIA during the Afghan resistance against the Soviet Union and how this was partly a problem of our own creation. Bin Laden's origins with the CIA were reiterated during an intelligence briefing held at Camp Fuji in late September, 2001.

I later found out that those Marines of 1/3 were amongst the first to deploy during the newly christened "War on Terror."

I would also later find out more about the mysterious stock trading that took place directly before 9/11, from the official 9/11 Commission itself...

"The SEC

The terrorist's lucky streak began the week before September 11th with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. The SEC, in concert with the United States intelligence agencies, has sophisticated software programs that are used in "real-time" to watch both domestic and overseas markets to seek out trends that may indicate a present or future crime. In the week prior to September 11th both the SEC and U.S. intelligence agencies ignored one major stock market indicator, one that could have yielded valuable information with regard to the September 11th attacks.

On the Chicago Board Options Exchange during the week before September 11th, put options were purchased on American and United Airlines, the two airlines involved in the attacks. The investors who placed these orders were gambling that in the short term the stock prices of both Airlines would plummet. Never before on the Chicago Exchange were such large amounts of United and American Airlines options traded. These investors netted a profit of at least $5 million after the September 11th attacks.

Interestingly, the names of the investors remain undisclosed and the $5 million remains unclaimed in the Chicago Exchange account.

Why these aberrant trades were not discovered prior to 9/11? Who were the individuals who placed these trades? Have they been investigated? Who was responsible for monitoring these activities? Have those individuals been held responsible for their inaction?"

The 9/11 Commission would later conclude that "unusual" and "suspicious trading on its face" was ultimately innocuous because those involved had no conceivable ties to al Qaeda. A conclusion you can only find acceptable if you assume al Qaeda was actually or solely responsible for the attacks.

Having these pieces of the puzzle coming together, it was actually a speech given by President George W. Bush that served as the final jolt that awakened me. In this speech re-aired months later, George Bush stated: "America was targeted for attack because we're the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world. And no one will keep that light from shining."

I found this explanation childish and insulting to one's intelligence. That men committed suicide and mass murder in one of the most heinous attacks in human history because they were jealous and offended by our "beacon of freedom and opportunity" didn't pan out. It wasn't long after this, that I started seeking the true reason people might hate America enough to conduct an attack like this.

I read USMC General Smedley Butler's "War is a Racket."

I read history, I read the Qu'ran, twice. I watched Loose Change. I began to realize 9/11 was not an act of revenge, jealousy or hatred but rather a "false flag" attack, in the same vain as Nero burning Rome, the sinking of the USS Maine, the burning of the Reichstag by Hitler, or the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

9/11 was what PNAC's "Rebuilding of America's Defenses" called a "new Pearl Harbor," a catalyst for what the 2006 QDR calls the "long war" against "Radical Islam," an intangible, omnipresent, immortal, global terrorist network requiring a global solution.

We look back 9 years and see what this "long war" has yielded. Four-thousand plus dead American troops, hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis and Afghans, millions maimed, mentally inflicted, or displaced, trillions in tax dollars wasted, a destroyed economy, wars with Pakistan and Iran in the works, the dismantling of our US Constitution and a windfall profit of trillions for the globalist corporations built upon all of this misery and destruction.

We see 9/11 and the resulting "clash of civilizations" constantly used as a distraction from the real issues of globalist banksters usurping national and individual sovereignty. As 9/11 fades from the collective memory of America, new diversions must be invented. This year, the latest in manufactured globalists hoaxes, is the "Ground Zero Mosque." It must be noted that Thomas Kean, Republican, Council on Foreign Relations member, and Chairman of the 9/11 Commission referenced above, is now Chairman of the Carnegie Corporation directly funding the so called "Ground Zero Mosque" and "Imam" Faisal Abdul Rauf's activities. Rauf himself is a CFR member, in full service of the globalists.

This PR stunt is being used to re-open the wounds of 9/11, re-inject the official narrative covering up the globalists' crimes, and further divide and polarize America within, and the world as a whole ahead of an impending war with Iran.

So, 9/11 is a time we should be outraged, reminded of how far the globalists are willing to go to achieve their goals. Murdering 3,000 people to justify a war to kill millions more is a danger we can no longer afford to ignore. Globalization is real, the globalist elite exist. The next question we have to ask ourselves is what are we going to do about it?

Thousands have turned to activism, exposing the truth that 9/11 was indeed an inside job. Their tireless efforts have entered the term "false flag attack" into our collective lexicon, denying the globalists their favorite method of starting epic wars and manipulating the masses.

I believe the next step is a gaining a better understanding of who the globalists really are. The following lists are taken directly from the official Council on Foreign Relations and Chatham House websites.

http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/roster.html

http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/membership/corporate/major_corporate_members_list/

http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/membership/corporate/corporate_members_list/

These corporations, their boards of directors, the bankers that own them, and the policy wonks that work for them ARE your real enemy. They manipulate all sides of every conflict, propose all sorts of imagined enemies for you to fight against, control everything you see, read, watch, and listen to in the mainstream media, at the book store, and even billboards on your way to work.

These are the people we need to unite against. You can start by boycotting all of them. You can't seriously say you are fighting the globalist elite while you patronize their very operations, feed them your hard earned money, effort, and attention. The fight can seem overwhelming, but this is something everyone can do starting now.

Look down these lists, and start boycotting them, exposing them, and replacing them with a better, local alternative. The Truthers and the Patriots have already balked a great number of the globalists' favorite tactics and plans, let us now cut their supply lines and flood their channels of communication with truth.

Let 9/11 be a reminder of how ruthless the globalist elite are, let their latest "ground zero mosque" stunt and their "clash of civilizations" be a reminder of how remorseless and shameless they are, and how they have no intention of stopping now.


To conclude my personal story, I left the Marines, I left America, just shortly before the Iraq invasion in 2003. My parting words to my fellow Marines were that General Smedley Butler was and is right ... War is a racket, Iraq will be no different. There will be no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Gordon Brown on the "Non-Existent" Global Government

By Tony Cartalucci

"That global ethic can infuse the fairness and responsibility that is necessary for these institutions to work, but we should not lose the chance in this generation, in this decade in particular, with President Obama in America, with other people working with us around the world, to create global institutions for the environment, and for finance, and for security and for development, that make sense of our responsibility to other peoples, our desire to bind the world together, and our need to tackle problems that everybody knows exist."
-Gordon Brown, Prime Minister UK

Gordon Brown is talking about what many people are calling global governance, or when they aren't mincing words, global government. Similar calls are made from Council on Foreign Relations members like Fareed Zakaria, a regular contributor for propaganda clearing house "Newsweek" in articles like "Writing the Rules for a New World."

Global problems, they argue, need global solutions. Global problems like the H1N1 Swine Flu pandemic, which later turned out to be over-hyped by industry insiders. Global problems like the current economic melt down perpetrated by the very financial institutions and regulatory organizations seeking additional authority and consolidation with even less oversight than before. Global problems like "terrorism" and "conflict" that the globalists are firmly, undoubtedly behind. Indeed, they are proposing global government to solve these global problems, they themselves are making.

These are immensely powerful people, the remnants of the European empires and the by-product of America's "Manifest Destiny" seeking global consolidation through these "global institutions."

But what Gordon Brown says in the beginning is absolutely right. The people's means of communicating allows them to understand and solve problems faster and more efficiently. What he is proposing however, is to take this grassroots power away from the people and channel it through elitist controlled "global institutions." What is more insulting, is that the examples he uses to invoke our sympathy and support for his call for global institutionalization, are all contrived, engineered, or perpetrated by the elite he is a representative of.

The Vietnam War was executed by the Americans. The death of Iranian dissident Neda was during U.S. backed unrest in Iran. Global warming has also fallen on its face as an absolute fraud, with carbon trading banks putting up "Carbon Clocks" then being caught defrauding this still in utero carbon market before the real scam even began.

"Gordon Brown: Wiring a web for global good "




Gordon Brown is a used-car salesman. He has something of such utter worthlessness, of such questionable quality, and is attempting to sell it to you to your own detriment and to his own benefit. A man like this, no matter how expensive the suit, no matter what the introduction given, no matter how sympathy-evoking his slides are, is nothing more than a salesman looking to cheat you.

The world is already becoming a better place, where immense corruption and the criminals purveying it are being exposed, and the tide of justice and equality is being turned because of decentralized, grassroots efforts, utilizing technology, communication, and soon, personal manufacturing. Don't let used-car salesmen like Gordon Brown convince you of handing over this great equalizer to him and his "global institutions."